Options
Musky
pinno
Posts: 50,651
Faceache was brought under considerable scrutiny after incidents of self harm , bullying and suicides after which they promised to monitor content.
Musk had said that the accounts of some controversial Twitters would be re-instated some time ago, long before he bought out Twitter under the apparent 'freedom of speech' to which he obviously wants to promote.
Are the sacked 8000 employees instrumental in monitoring Twitter content and if so, will Twitter end up in the same situation of under-regulated content as FB?
Does the future of Twitter in the hands of Musk bode well?
Musk had said that the accounts of some controversial Twitters would be re-instated some time ago, long before he bought out Twitter under the apparent 'freedom of speech' to which he obviously wants to promote.
Are the sacked 8000 employees instrumental in monitoring Twitter content and if so, will Twitter end up in the same situation of under-regulated content as FB?
Does the future of Twitter in the hands of Musk bode well?
seanoconn - gruagach craic!
0
Posts
It’s one thing being a “free speech absolutist” and running a social media app whose income model currently relies solely on third party advertisers.
All I can see is a awful online place for polarised views which will haemorrhage cash, advertisers and users.
As for trump, he’s invested in his own platform while we won’t get paid from twitter, so can’t see him pivoting back as it will mean failure for his baby.
Mind you a lot of people wrote off Tesla and he tweeted why people wanted Tesla to fail. You can’t write the guy of as his plans will become clearer once the dust has settled
Desmond Tutu
The more I see of Musk the more I wonder if he was a deep cover sleeper agent, he seems intent on disruption!
Noted that several large companies have pulled advertising already.
I am not sure. You have no chance.
They’ll be sweating for quite a while haaaa
KYC lads
How much of his investment has already gone up in smoke, I wonder. Reckon he must have knocked off half, as he's scaring away both users and advertisers, and it has virtually no tangible assets.
Knock-on effect, Tesla shares down nearly 10% on the week?
Either way, a few people will be sweating.
A lot of Saudis in this case, I think?
For sure.
There's a void between Twitter's type of unfiltered 'news sources' and the 'MSM' under owners' control: both have their place, but one needs to be wary of both, for different reasons.
And further, if the pub owner started being an censored and letting other arseholes scream at you constantly, it wouldn't be anyone else's fault if people went elsewhere.
Approaching it like a Redditor shitposter however will definitely help.